Google
 

Schillings Lawyers send 'Take Down' notice to pickledbushman.com

02/22/08

Schillings Lawyers send 'Take Down' notice to pickledbushman.com

Permalink 03:27:14 pm, Categories: The site, Rant and Rave, YouTube, Wikileaks, 1195 words

So I woke up this morning to find a "take down" notice in my email inbox, and to be honestly surprised it did not come from Scientologists. It came from some other bottom feeders... Rich criminal defence lawyers that protect the big money of convicted criminals.

Basically these law firms are very happy to accept the blood money their clients make in exchange for their "services". In my mind evil can only happen when good men (and woman) stand by and do nothing and in the case of a law firm like Schillings Lawyers.... they not only do nothing, they for financial reward, attempt to stifle free speech and those critical of the criminals they defend.

In my case, Schillings Lawyers sent a threatening email to my hosts (The full PDF of what they sent me can be found here: http://newz.co.za/blood_money/stupid_legal_notice.pdf . I have hosted it off site so that my current host (The Planet) can not be held liable for it). However, that said, to quote the important bit:

"We understand that you host the website www.pickledbushman.com (“the
website”) and we write to you in that capacity.
We refer to a recent posting appearing on the Website entitled:
“Arsenal football club bought out with blood money” (“the Posting”). The Posting
reproduces an article originally written by Craig Murray. The Posting can be
found via the link:
http://www.pickledbushman.com/index.php/2007/09/27/arsenal_football_club_bought_out_with_bl
The posting is false, indefensible and grossly defamatory of our client. Our client
views this matter extremely seriously"

A quick point to Schillings Lawyers... "labling something as "private and confidential" does not make it so. I have entered into no such contract with your insidious law firm.

The post they are referring to is one in which I wrote about how Alisher Usmanov (a convicted criminal) purchased Arsenal Football Club with blood money he earned while he allegedly built his cartel on drug money, extortion and other illegal activities.

However, this post is not about how siff the guy is (that was the purpose of my last post), but rather the bottom feeders that crow around his money at your expense. If you would like to find out more information about Alisher Usmanov please read this article by Craig Murray (former ambassador) http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2007/09/alisher_usmanov.html .

The information Schillings Lawyers wanted me to remove was a copy of Craig Murray's post I had added at the end of my writing to give people more information about this shady character.

In response to that, I have had to remove the duplication of Craig Murrays article and have it now hosted in a country that is legally safe for it (and therefore out of the jurestriction of The Planet). I have included links back on the post back to the original article in its entirety.

When I used google to research what Schillings Lawyers have being up to... Google came back with a real lot of responses, and it seems that most bloggers that have reproduced that article by Craig have also being threatened by them.

Matt Warden, a prominent political blogger had this to say

"Schillings, a London Law firm, have closed down several prominent political blogs (case study on dealing with the “internet attacker“) by contacting their webhosts, on behalf the new part owner of Arsenal - Alisher Usmanov.

Mr Usmanov’s lawyers have also sent “cease and desist” type letters to a number of other blogs that dare to mention the fact that he has been criticised, including Arsenal Fan Blogs.
"

http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2007/09/21/webhost-removes-bloggerheads-and-other-sites-after-legal-threats/

So it appears an all out attack on freedom of speech has being instigated by Alisher and law firm Schillings Lawyers.

It seems that its not only bloggers who are the victims of Schillings Lawyers. It appears that they attempted to take on one of the most important sites on the Internet today, Wikileaks.org. Wikileaks.org is a website dedicated to getting the truth out. For the leaking of important sensitive documents that almost always incriminate those in positions of power.

An article linked to wikileaks.org has this to say about Schillings:

"Have WikileakS.org successfully faced down the notorious legal firm of London based minor celebrity media spin lawyers Schillings, whose attempts to censor UK political blogs backfired so spectacularly over their rich client Alisher Usmanov''s criminal past ?

They were threatening WikiLeakS.org on behalf of the discredited Northern Rock plc, who managed to have the first run on a bank in the UK in over 140 years, and who, together with the inept handling of the crisis by the Labour government, are costing the UK taxpayer billions of pounds."

Original link

As you can see, Schillings Lawyers appears to be on the rampage in their attempts to silence people critical of their criminal clients. I just had a thought about this. From what I can see based on this information at my disposal... Schillings Lawyers clients that have being mentioned in the news and information I have seen... all appear to be very shady and illegal characters or companies that hide behind their blood money and lawyers. I wonder who the rest of Schillings Lawyers customers are, and I have to wonder if all of them are just as guilty of similar or worse crimes than the ones we know of their clients whos crimes we do know.

To me, if someone had to mention to me that they were represented by Schilling Lawyers the first few thoughts would be, "criminal, lots of blood money, dangerous". As you can see in the original legal PDF document sent to me the names of the partners at this infamous law are:

Rachel Atkins
Gideon Benaim
Rob Christie-Miller
John Kelly
Keith Schilling
Simon Smith

I am writing down those names so that history can remember them for the kind of people they are. They are the architects behind Schillings Lawyers and in my mind... are just as guilty as their clients.

There's an old saying, "No single raindrop believes it is guilty for the flood" Nowhere is this more evident than here.

Ive said what I have wanted to say about Schillings Lawyers and their siff tactics and I would suggest that everyone out there watch what this law firm and what their clients are up to, because they are the smoke that indicates that there is a fire.

On a personal note to Schillings Lawyers... should you send a take down notice to me about this post I will be shutting down my hosting account with The Planet, and I will be moving it to South African hosting which will be completely beyond your control. I will also make sure that all information about what you try do to this site and others is well documented for future generations to see.

More reading:
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2474&Itemid=81
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Murray
http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2007/09/21/webhost-removes-bloggerheads-and-other-sites-after-legal-threats/
http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/?p=1467

Permalink 9 comments

Comments:

Comment from: Sminty [Visitor]
Tsk tsk...if you've done nothing wrong you've got nothing to hide.

You go bushman!
Permalink 02/26/08 @ 17:24
Comment from: jams o donnell [Visitor]
I'm sorry to hear this. I didn't realise that Jabba the Uzbek's bottom feeders are still at it. I wouild have thought they got the message last year when they got Bloggerheads and Craig Murray's sites taken down.
Permalink 04/14/08 @ 19:08
Comment from: edna [Visitor]
its not like schillings are representing bush or blair, they are the ultimate murderers!!! they stem from a system that wants to be like apartheid south africa south africa or nazi germany. are you also a raindrop in this flood why don't you guys find some bigger fish to fry like bush and blair!!! i scared of something more than having your blog taken down??? your lucky usmanov resorts to the law bush and blair don't, by their accounts only GOD can judge them!!! if you have anything take it to court or wont it stand there??? and if you're using any oil based products you are also a raindrop in the most disgusting flood of the century
Permalink 05/06/08 @ 15:49
Comment from: pb [Member]
Hi,

Take your bipolar medication? :) Seriously now.... this post was dealing with siff lawyers and their ilk. Tell you what, if you feel so strongly about Bush (about to be replaced by Obama), and Blair (already replaced by Gordon Brown)... why dont you go lay charges at the international court in the Huage?

Now, if you feel like keeping this on topic and being more sensible, I will be happy to respond.

Regards,
Bushman
Permalink 05/06/08 @ 16:29
Comment from: edna [Visitor]
yes i'm working on taking the assholes to court!!! bush and blair (uk & US) what are you working on!!! what ever it is it hasn't succeeded against usmanov
Permalink 05/09/08 @ 15:46
Comment from: pb [Member]
Sure Edna, good luck with that, dont forget that courts require something called, "evidence" and just your opinion doesnt cut it in the court of law.

Hopefully you have mounds of evidence with which to present at the Hauge which no one else has.

As to Usmanov, I have said my opinion on him, I dont have a crusade against him. Personally I would like to spend more time writing about the disgusting human right abuses by Middle East oil dictators (Like the Saudi Royal family)... or even bigger criminals, such as the Chinese ruling party. You handle Bush and Blair as you see fit.. I will keep telling people about my opinion in my own way.
Permalink 05/09/08 @ 16:03
Comment from: edna [Visitor]
as for the bi polar issue. only hitler and the nazi have such a history of putting people down with so called mental health problems!!! got a problem with mental health???? are you hitler!!! is it an issue???
Permalink 05/09/08 @ 16:34
Comment from: pb [Member]
In response to Ednas post calling me a Nazi, I just thought I would show other readers here how silly her point is. What she did there is known as a logical fallacy. It used mostly by religious fantatics who are too stupid to know any better, or political agitators trying to push their own agenda.

The Hitler Card
Alias: Argumentum ad Nazium

Type: Guilt by Association

Example:

[T]he ideas of ecologists about invasive species—alien species as they are often called—sound…similar to anti-immigration rhetoric. Green themes like scarcity and purity and invasion and protection all have right-wing echoes. Hitler's ideas about environmentalism came out of purity, after all.

Source: Interview of Betsy Hartmann by Fred Pearce, "The Greening of Hate", New Scientist, 2/20/2003
Forms
Adolf Hitler accepted idea I.
Therefore, I must be wrong. The Nazis accepted idea I.
Therefore, I must be wrong.
Examples
Hitler was in favor of euthanasia.
Therefore, euthanasia is wrong. The Nazis favored eugenics.
Therefore, eugenics is wrong.
Counter-Examples
Hitler was a vegetarian.
Therefore, vegetarianism is wrong. The Nazis were conservationists.
Therefore, conservationism is wrong.
Exposition:

In almost every heated debate, one side or the other—often both—plays the "Hitler card", that is, criticizes their opponent's position by associating it in some way with Adolf Hitler or the Nazis in general. This move is so common that it led Mike Godwin to develop the well-known "Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies": "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."

No one wants to be associated with Nazism because it has been so thoroughly discredited in both theory and practise, and Hitler of course was its most famous exponent. So, linking an idea with Hitler or Nazism has become a common form of argument ascribing guilt by association.

Some instances of the Hitler card are factually incorrect, or even ludicrous, in ascribing ideas to Hitler or other Nazis that they did not hold. However, from a logical point of view, even if Hitler or other Nazis did accept an idea, this historical fact alone is insufficient to discredit it.

The Hitler Card is often combined with other fallacies, for instance, a weak analogy between an opponent and Hitler, or between the opposition political group and the Nazis. A related form of fallacious analogy is that which compares an opposition's actions with the Holocaust. This is a form of the ad Nazium fallacy because it casts the opposition in the role of Nazi. Not only do such arguments assign guilt by association, but the analogy used to link the opposition's actions with the Holocaust may be superficial or question-begging.

Other arguments ad Nazium combine guilt by association with a slippery slope. For instance, it is sometimes argued that the Nazis practised euthanasia, and therefore even voluntary forms of it are a first step onto a slippery slope leading to extermination camps. Like many slippery slope arguments, this is a way of avoiding arguing directly against voluntary euthanasia, instead claiming that it may indirectly lead to something admittedly bad.

Playing the Hitler Card demonizes opponents in debate by associating them with evil, and almost always derails the discussion. People naturally resent being associated with Nazism, and are usually angered. In this way, playing the Hitler Card can be an effective distraction in a debate, causing the opponent to lose track of the argument. However, when people become convinced by guilt by association arguments that their political opponents are not just mistaken, but are as evil as Nazis, reasoned debate can give way to violence. So, playing the Hitler Card is more than just a dirty trick in debate, it is often "fighting words".
Exposure:

Germany today bans capital punishment, but the history of this ban is surprising: The government of the former West Germany adopted the ban in 1949 and it continues in effect today in the reunited Germany. The law which banned the death penalty was proposed by a politician sympathetic to the Nazi war criminals who were being executed after World War 2, and was intended to block such executions. Should the disreputable historical origins of the ban influence those Germans who today oppose capital punishment to reconsider their views? Should the ban be repealed simply because it was the brainchild of a Nazi sympathizer? Capital punishment is either right or wrong. If it is right, then the ban should be repealed, regardless of its origins; if it's wrong, then the ban should be continued, despite its origins. While the history of the origins of Germany's ban on capital punishment is interesting, it is irrelevant to the moral and legal question of whether the ban should continue. Those Germans who support capital punishment should resist the temptation to play the Hitler card.


http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adnazium.html


Now Edna, regarding your post about Iraq... what the HECK does that have to do with Schillings Lawyers? Seriously now.. and if you are getting so worked up about Iraq and all the people dying theere (though your propagandic numbers are skewed).... why are you not doing anything about the millions and millions of people killed in China or forced into labour camps there? Why only this issue? Why? Because you are a) either muslim and thefore bigoted or b) Being brainwashed, have no clue about whats really happening in the world, and doing it because you think its cool. Both are not worth my time. When you can look beyond Iraq... and have an informed opinion and have grasped the concept of punctuation... feel free to post here again Edna!

Good bye.... I am going away for the weekend, so I wish everyone the best.
Permalink 05/09/08 @ 16:41
Comment from: Inyoni [Visitor]
"EDNA" needs to chill out , she's going to pop a vein or something just now .

And please spell South Africa with a capital S and A.
Permalink 09/18/08 @ 20:35

This post has 10 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

pickledbushman.com

My status

Contact Me

wtf is wrong with all you people?

 << <February 2012> >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Search

Categories

pickledbushman.com

Archives

Linkblog

leet software

leet sites

Who's Online?

Account

Sponsor


Linkage

ANTOWAN
CARLSPIES
FMTECH
SHUTTLEWORTH
SHOPBOT.CO.NZ
IAN FRASER
JHBLIVE.COM
NEWZ
ANTITRUST
HELLKOM
TAG
KARMIC SANGOMA
BEENZ

Syndicate this blog

powered by
B2/Evolution

I shmaak SA Blogs, sorted with Amatomu.com

Afrigator

Static Page 1
Static Page 2

Sponsor


Valid XHTML || Valid CSS || Valid RSS || Valid Atom